Put AI to Work
April 15-18, 2019
New York, NY

Executive Briefing: The hidden data in AI IP

Thomas M (Black Hills IP)
11:05am11:45am Thursday, April 18, 2019
Secondary topics:  Data and Data Networks
Average rating: *****
(5.00, 1 rating)

Who is this presentation for?

  • Managers and executives creating products and businesses entering global markets



What you'll learn

  • Gain insights into hurdles, opportunities, and partnerships in global markets
  • Compare US and Chinese AI technology development and implementation
  • Explore predictions for AI growth and leadership based on IP data


Over 500 years ago, the first patent statute was enacted in Venice, and patent systems evolved across the world from there over the next half-millennium. In the US, the constitution specifically authorizes a patent system through language found in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8: “To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.” At the most basic, a patent represents a trade—a limited monopoly in exchange for promotion of science.

What does this have to do with AI? Data. Every patent application must include a detailed technical description of the invention to be protected. This is in turn published publicly so others can read and learn from the inventor. Moreover, the patent also carries some very useful additional metadata: inventor names, addresses, the companies they work for (the patent owner), the date of the patent filing, a list of related patents/applications, and more. Between this metadata and the technical description of the invention, you have quite an amazing dataset identifying research and development activity that has been deemed valuable enough to spend money on for a chance at patent protection (not cheap). In many ways, if you want to analyze a technology space, patent data can be better than analyzing products; it provides much more detail and identifies technology that did not or has not hit the market.

Drawing on an in-house dataset of over 100 million global patent matters and their metadata, Thomas Marlow digs into the tens of thousands of patents in force and pending before world patent offices, which demarcate the field of AI. This rich dataset includes ownership, inventorship, importance indicators, custom categorization into technology types and application fields, and additional categorization and analytical data is generated from a balanced combination of expert and AI-assisted analysis. Thomas dives into this data to illustrate technology development trends, who owns what, where this IP originated, where it is held, and how this data lines up with to the current rhetoric around AI superpower development.

US and China AI happen to be a hot topic for discussion these days. Today China stands toe to toe with the US in its value from a patent holding and enforcement venue. This means that there are a lot of patent filings in China, providing great data to work off of when comparing US and Chinese development and the value of technology in each jurisdiction. While in the past, Chinese companies have repurposed Silicon Valley technologies for the China domestic market, the pendulum may swing back, based on data showing AI implementation technology patented by domestic Chinese companies in China but not the US. The publication of Chinese patents on technologies not concurrently protected in the US—which makes that technology public domain, able to be freely used—has the potential to drive US copying of Chinese-originated AI tech. Join in as Thomas pulls back the curtain, offering a glimpse at those technologies.

Topics include:

  • The global IP landscape
    • Top players in each key jurisdiction
    • Trends across countries
    • Deep learning patent progression across China, the US, and Europe
  • IP impact on future development and rollout of AI technologies
    • How does this data affect development and market strategy?
    • How does foundational and implementational patents affect partnering and licensing opportunities for market access and technology advancement?
  • A comparison of US and Chinese IP landscapes
    • IP and assertion infrastructures
    • Impact on patent holdings and filings
    • Categories by foundational and implementational AI
    • Chinese companies that are leading implementational AI in areas like neural networks, manufacturing AI, consumer AI, and enterprise AI
    • Who is the next Chinese AI unicorn?
    • Who is the next Chinese AI Mark Zuckerberg or Steve Jobs?
    • Trends illustrating US AI companies and solutions in China while Chinese companies are decreasingly interested in entering the US market—and reasons why
    • Who is leveraging state-of-the art AI technology in China?
    • The cities, areas, and people involved
Photo of Thomas M

Thomas M

Black Hills IP

Tom Marlow is the CTO for Black Hills IP, where he works tirelessly to drive IP legal services into that age of AI and automation. Relying on data wherever it can be found, Tom and the Black Hills team build products to power internal staff and legal professional customers. Tom has a background in technology and analytics. Being exposed to massive amounts of patent data very early in his career, he learned techniques to quickly build datasets and evaluate the results to drive strategy. This work led to a corporate leadership position driving global IP operation and strategy for the renowned Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation. In addition to maintaining a portfolio of several thousand patents, Tom managed patent development, litigation, licensing and acquisition across the US, Europe, and Asia. Around this time, Tom coauthored a desk reference for patent attorneys that provided an indexed analysis of appeals decisions for use in prosecuting patent applications (which is now in its 7th edition). Tom is a registered patent attorney and electrical engineer with a passion for IP systems. Previously, he was cochair of the Patent Analytics and Portfolio Management Department at the Minneapolis patent firm Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, PA. Tom has advised companies from startups to household name multinationals on IP strategy, operations, and policy and has spoken before a diverse audiences from patent attorneys to C-suite executives to engineers to startup founders on patent management, analysis, and strategy. He holds a law degree from Franklin Pierce Law Center and a BS from the University of Notre Dame.

Comments on this page are now closed.


Gayathri N |
05/14/2019 1:16am EDT

It is a period of Artificial Intelligence and IPs ruling the world creating technology wars. And Mr. Thomas, what you have captured during the AI IP Business Summit is stupendous. You have highlighted all the vital points, which were discussed and have brought it out with understanding to every reader’s eyes.