Intellectual control





In the early days of software engineering, Edsger Dijkstra warned us not to let the size and complexity of our programs cause us to lose “intellectual control” due to the limited nature of our minds. To George Fairbanks’s knowledge, Dijkstra never defined precisely what intellectual control was. Our software today is staggeringly larger than the programs of the 1960s, so does that mean we have it under our intellectual control or did we find ways to make progress without Dijkstra’s high standards?

George Fairbanks
George Fairbanks is a software engineer at Google and the author of the book Just Enough Software Architecture and the Pragmatic Designer column for IEEE Software magazine.
Platinum Sponsor
Gold Sponsors
Silver Sponsors
Exhibitor
Innovators
Supporting
Community Partner
Contact us
confreg@oreilly.com
For conference registration information and customer service
partners@oreilly.com
For more information on community discounts and trade opportunities with O’Reilly conferences
Become a sponsor
For information on exhibiting or sponsoring a conference
pr@oreilly.com
For media/analyst press inquires